Thursday, March 28, 2013

FIAS: Fight for a sport called MMA or even combat sambo



Dear Mr. Verbruggen,
Many thanks for the detailed letter of 22.02.2013 regarding the perspectives of COMBAT SAMBO inclusion into the SportAccord Combat Games.
Notwithstanding that SAMBO is a ‘non-Olympic’ Sport, SAMBO is developing rapidly, and surely for us the opinion of SpotrAccord is extremely important.
Please, consider that the members of the FIAS Executive Board will be considering all your recommendations at the nearest meeting, planned for the 22 of March.
We are completely agree that there might be some ways how to hold the violence in Sport and to promote all Olympic values throughout all membership of SportAccord, and we are ready to facilitate this issue. We hope that after the FIAS EB meeting the overall (common) decision how to finalize the controversy will be taken and we will advise of it to You duly.
Staying at your disposal
V. Shestakov
President
N. Lents
SG 

Dear Mr. Shestakov, Dear Mr. Lents,
Thank you again for your understanding of the situation and the challenges that we face in securing the IOC Patronage.
As explained previously, the topic of violence in sports, and the underlying security, health and safety of the athletes is one of the priority subject on the IOC’s agenda. The IOC has taken a few steps to evaluate this issue. First, strong recommendations have been made during the IOC Congress in 2009 as follows: “Protecting the physical and psychological health of all athletes must be a major priority for the entire Olympic Movement. Attention must be given to the specific needs of athletes with a disability. In support of these objectives the IOC and the other constituents of the Olympic Movement should implement educational programmes providing information on training methods, gender specific health protection and injury prevention. Such programmes should be based on IOC Medical Guidelines and be widely disseminated at the Olympic Games, the Youth Olympic Games and other major international competitions. Proactive information programmes should be organised on a nationwide, sport-by-sport basis through the national and international sporting bodies, the National Olympic Committees, schools and other educational institutions”. Additionally, following the Executive Commission in Dubai in 2010, a questionnaire on “health, security, safety and insurance” was sent to all Olympic International Federations emphasizing attention paid by the IOC to the following areas: level of physical exposure, injury surveillance programmes, technical development and equipment evolution, rules evolution, venue safety and athlete eligibility checks. The IOC is also working collaboratively with the athletes on this topic. The athletes have formulated the recommendations during the 5th Athlete International Forum as follows: « Role of Athletes in Decision-making Processes : The Athletes’ Forum strongly believes that athlete involvement in the decision-making process regarding health, safety and security should be increased. Their role should also be broadened in areas such as sports rule evolution and event organisation. ».
From our understanding, significant attention is specifically paid to the rules and the equipment of a sport and/or a style/discipline. Any rule, style or labelled event which is seen as potentially not meeting expectations – quite subjective at this stage – can reflect negatively on the whole sport and/or discipline. As you can see, this is an ongoing evaluation process, and, as said in my previous communication, I fully agree that determining the level of violence that we collectively can/should accept, or not, within the context of future SportAccord World Combat Games is a topic that deserves a serious discussion. As part of our future collective approach about this topic, we are considering appointing a technical expert who may provide us with a critical view in this analysis. Regarding Sambo Combat, in the current circumstances, this discipline does not fulfil the IOC expectations on the athletes’ safety. However, we are committed to working with you to evaluate how we can change the situation for the future editions of the event.
Regarding the quotas, I want to thank you for confirming the use of the overall quota for FIAS delegation including 96 athletes. Regarding the details of the FIAS sports programme, we would be grateful if you can confirm the categories for the Sambo Sport discipline as soon as possible. As confirmed during the operational meeting in January, the deadline to communicate the sports programme to the Local Organizing Committee was set for the end of the first week in February. As you have not confirmed the categories by the deadline, we had to assume that the categories for the Sambo Sport discipline would be similar to those in Beijing in 2010, and had to include this information in the programme sent to the Local Organizing Committee.
We look forward to cooperating successfully with FIAS on all these questions
With kind regards,
Hein Verbruggen
Dear Mr.Verbruggen,
Many thanks for your letter of 14 of January’2013.
Following your request, we are kindly confirming that we would keep of Overall Quota for the FIAS delegation, including 96 athletes within the Program of the SportAccord World Combat Games to be held in St.-Petersburg in 2013.
At the same time, concerning the position of FIAS on exclusion of Combat SAMBO from the sports Program of the SAWCG-2013, we have to take a collegial, decision at the nearest FIAS Executive Board meeting.
In accordance with the decision of FIAS EB we would finally fix: the competitions format on SAMBO, including the categories, time-schedule, times and sessions (18-19 October).
To discuss this issue in details and to adopt the correct decision by the FIAS Executive Board, we would be obliged a lot if you could kindly provide the corresponding materials, regarding the precise reasons and criteria, connected with the exclusion of COMBAT SAMBO from the Program of the forthcoming SA WCG 2013, to be submitted to the members of the FIAS Executive Board for their consideration.
Hoping for further fruitful cooperation,
With best regards,
V.Shestakov
FIAS President
N.Lents
FIAS Secretary General 


Dear Mr. Shestakov, Dear Mr. Lents,
Thank you for your positive answer and above all for your understanding of the challenges we face in securing the IOC Patronage. The IOC situation is indeed sensitive for both our organisations, as on one hand, SportAccord is faced with the pressure of securing the IOC Patronage from the IOC – for promotional, sponsorship and credibility purposes – in the interest of all participating IFs, and on the other hand, FIAS is applying for IOC recognition in 2013, which of course requires you to carefully handle the situation from a strategic standpoint. I have no doubt however we will be able to progress this discussion positively.
I fully agree that determining the level of violence that we collectively can/should accept, or not, within the context of future SportAccord World Combat Games is a topic that deserves a serious discussion. We will make sure we put this on the agenda of our next plenary session, during which we will invite the IOC to present their perspective on the subject. In any case, you will be receiving further technical information and explanations way before then.
Finally, I conclude from your non-answer on the topic of quotas that you want to maintain the same numbers for FIAS as previously shared with our team, which we take note of.
With kind regards,
Hein Verbruggen


Dear Mr. Verbruggen,
Thanks for the letter specifying the details and your personal considerations that are undoubtedly valuable for us and as we strongly believe your recommendations are based on your vast experience which we always have been following for many cooperative years up till now inclusively.
From the very beginning the SA multi-sports projects appeared as very effective and competitive events at a very high level under the IOC Patronage, that allowed the “non-Olympic” sports and disciplines to be improved and promoted worldwide. SA multisport events are becoming more and more popular to the significant benefit of all Stakeholders: the SA members partners and sponsors, hosting cities, and of course the SportAccord itself.
Following these noble objectives we would like to provide all possible support for the benefit of Your multisport project – the SAWCG .
At the same time the withdrawal in SAWCG 2013 edition of Combat Sambo one of the most spectacular disciplines, was a success during the 1st WCG in Beijing can negatively influence the success of the overall event, especially because of it would be staged in the cradle of this sport – in Russia (St. Petersburg).
The Aspect of violence in Combat sports discipline is a very delicate issue and the absence of clear criteria and arguments by which this or that discipline can be excluded from the program endangers the whole concept of the Combat Games project.
Without having been explained in proper transparent way to FIAS today, tomorrow any of the 15 participating IFs could suffer respectively from any subjective decision.
We consider that the upper mentioned issue is a concern of all the IFs- the SAWCG stakeholders, and therefore the FIAS is kindly asking you to hold a special session to discuss this pending issue with the participation of all 15 Ifs involved in order to find the proper solution for future Concept of our common event - SAWCG.
Awaiting your kindest response,
Sincerely
Vasily Shestakov
FIAS President
Nikolay Lents
FIAS Secretary General 


Dear Mr. Shestakov, Dear Mr. Lents,
Thank you for your feedback, which we will be sharing with the IOC in the context of the conditional IOC Patronage to our event. As previously mentioned, we will communicate further technical reasons for this decision from the IOC, when the information is being received following our request. I cannot tell you when this will be concluded however, but we will ensure this is done within reasonable delays.
On a more personal note, I want to explain that, as difficult to accept as it may be, those types of decisions simply cannot always be strictly objective and rational, and always leave room for what may appear to be subjective considerations. The IOC, however, sees themselves as independent and sovereign on the subject of those appreciations, and I know, will not appreciate too much questioning of their expertise, especially considering that fighting violence in sports is a topic which has received overwhelming consensus amongst their members. In this regards, I would have considered more appropriate to accept the decision that has been taken, and work with us and the IOC collaboratively and patiently with an objective to find an acceptable solution for post-2013 editions. From my perspective, the contrary can only have negative consequences for FIAS, but also for all of us collectively as we endeavour to obtain the IOC patronage for the overall benefit of the event.
I confirm herewith that we will not organise a Plenary Session to discuss what is essentially a bilateral matter of a concern to FIAS and SportAccord only, and that the meeting being planned for January 22-23, technical by nature, will not be a platform during which this subject will be discussed. We will discuss subjects of relevance to all, in all transparency and with constructive intentions, following the agreed agenda.
I must however insist on a related topic: I had, on several occasions, strongly suggested that, in the context of this decision, you should communicate to our team by November-end how you would like to reallocate the quotas of Combat Sambo to other disciplines which, to my knowledge, has not been done. This is therefore an urgent appeal for your to communicate your decision on the matter before the program is fully finalized, which will happen in the next days.
In conclusion, I would like to recommend that, in consideration of the overall benefit of the IOC patronage to all WCG participating IFs, FIAS accepts the decision that has been made, and, based on the technical reasons to be communicated in the near future, works with us on a possible solution for post-2013 editions. Many thanks for confirming your intentions in that regard, as well as on the previous point related to the reallocation of your quotas.
With best regards,
Hein Verbruggen


Dear Mr. Verbruggen,
Thank you for your letter regarding the SAMBO Combat discipline. We were happy to learn that corresponding description documents had been submitted to IOC for the review. Hopefully, we may have their recommendations and comments long before the SportAccord Combat Games, which we evaluate highly for the development of SAMBO. The importance of SAWCG 2013 for us as a SportAccord member and participant of the forthcoming World Event, encompassing the mixture of 15 Combat sports is vivid.
Following your advice we communicated with our EB members on the possibility of exclusion of the Combat SAMBO, and correspondingly informed our National SAMBO federations affiliated to FIAS.
As a result we have a unanimous position of FIAS leadership and national federations that the Combat SAMBO discipline is a very important integral part of our sport and we are not ready to accept the decision on its exclusion from the SportAccord Combat Games 2013 without being presented a clear reasons behind this.
We would be very obliged if you can provide us with the list of criteria, according which, the sports with the elements of violence are defined, and specific data within these criteria considered for evaluation of Combat SAMBO. Also we would like to understand what kind of expertise was involved to take the decision.
We kindly ask you to provide us with upper mentioned information in order to undertake relevant efforts to bring the discipline in compliance with the requirements in order not to lose one of the most attractive sports disciplines for our Combat Games.
We acknowledge that the Combat Games is a property of the SportAccord association with the 15 IFs being major stakeholders of this important event.
All these federations inevitably must be involved in essential decision making for these Games major issues and, especially, it refers to content the overall program of the Games. We consider that the transparency in the decision making process always has been an objective of SportAccord association and it is very important for the success and future prosperity of the Event.
Therefore for the benefit of the SA Combat Games we propose to convoke the Plenary session for all 15 Combat sports federations involved in the Games prior to the meeting on operational issues (planned on 22 of January) in order to discuss and approve overall sports schedule of the Games, cultural program, as well as other related terms and activities
Still hoping for the better,
Staying at your disposal

V. Shestakov
President

N.Lents
Secretary General

No comments: